Ticket #1102 (closed enhancement: fixed)
Consider switching to git
Reported by: | jdreed | Owned by: | achernya |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | Summer 2013 |
Component: | -- | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Fixed in version: | ||
Upstream bug: |
Description
because all the cool kids are doing it. And because of git-buildpackge or something.
Change History
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by jdreed
- Owner set to achernya
- Status changed from new to assigned
- Milestone changed from The Distant Future to Summer 2013
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by jdreed
The switch is done and git is live. We have some things to wrap up:
- What do we do with "dead" packages? We decided that "attic" is kind of pointless in svn, since we can just get history from the repo. But in Git each package is a repo, so the top level will get busy. Can we have multiple levels of submodules? Or should we move the git repo to /git/athena/attic or something? We need a better solution than "stop commiting to it and let it bitrot".
- Now that we're all on Git, can we "link" better to upstream c-p-d and nss_nonlocal? Or can we just move upstream c-p-d to Github or something?
- Documentation (I'll work on this)
- Anything else we need to worry about before closing this ticket? (Gerrit, gpb, etc are out of scope for this ticket).
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Notes from the meeting today (achernya, kaduk, amb, ghudson, vasilvv, jdreed) are at GitMigration?. Meeting attendees should update them as necessary. If anyone who was not at the meeting has suggestions or proposed changes, please discuss them in ticket comments, don't edit the page.